Environmental issues (more specifically, climate change) have a real presence in the upcoming presidential election. According to a survey conducted by the Sacred Heart University Polling Institute, 93.1% of respondents said they would be more likely to support a candidate whose platform includes a plan to improve the environment. But where do each of the candidates stand? Because, let's face it...some will be champions for the environment. And others will not be.
Summary: Does not believe there is a consensus on climate change. Does not believe the government should have a major role, other than ending subsidies to oil companies.
The Candidate Says: "I don't think the - the ozone has settled on that yet. I don't think everybody knows everything about global warming, because you have reputable scientists on both sides of that argument....[If the government is to do something about global warming] then you have to deal with the volcanoes and you have to deal with the pollution of China. So, do you want to invade China to make sure they don't pollute? And what are you going to do about the volcanoes? They are all contributing factors to global warming. But that doesn't mean that you shouldn't do what we can to slow up the emissions and stop subsidizing big oil companies. I don't like subsidizing the oil companies. They've been doing that for years." (Interview with Bill Maher, 30 March 2007)
If Elected, The Candidate Would...:
In The Past:
Current Status:
Other 2008 Presidential Candidates:
Democrats
Republicans: